Mar 30, 2022
In General Discussion
AI therefore cannot do a number of things independently that humans Whatsapp Number List can do independently. But this is also the case the other way around. For example, AI can absorb a lot of content in a short time and use this as input for the text. For example, an entire library of literature. Or all information on the internet about a Whatsapp Number List specific person. This allows AI to add a lot of value to your story. A collaboration between AI and humans therefore sounds like a nice combination for an in-depth book. But what about copyright? Douwe Linders: “The Copyright Whatsapp Number List Act stipulates that the copyright belongs to 'the maker'. Nowhere does it say that the maker should be human. In fact, pursuant to Article 8 of the Copyright Act, a foundation or Whatsapp Number List a company can also be the creator. Those are not people either.” What is a big difference between AI and, for example, a foundation, is that a foundation has a 'legal personality'. And you need a legal personality to be able to have rights and obligations, like a human being. legal personality Let's go back to the Whatsapp Number List email exchange with Wessel. He asked me if I agreed that he would be the Whatsapp Number List author of the book if he had it written by AI. My response was: Well, or is it a co-authorship? You can ask GPT-3 to develop an article based on your knowledge, but you can also ask a journalist to develop an article based on your knowledge. In this example, the journalist would receive the copyright, Whatsapp Number List but not GPT-3? Can we see this AI model as a word processor, or is it something more than that? Wessel's response to this was: More interesting is the question of whether a robot should be given legal personality.